About This Project

This project is, in many respects, a personal one.

The years covered in these pages were formative — not only for the Penrith Panthers as an institution, but for those who lived through the period from within.

The original Panthers, Passion & Politics manuscript was written by Jennie Bentley and published in 2007. It documents the period of Roger Cowan’s leadership from 1965 to 2005 — and the conflict that surrounded it. Particular attention is given to the final fifteen years of that period, with the last five examined in close detail by the author.

I have chosen to republish and serialise this material not to reopen old disputes, but to preserve a record.

When it was first published, there were threats of legal action. Strong views were held, and strong responses followed. The manuscript challenges decisions, questions motives, and is critical of actions taken at the highest levels of government.

Republishing it now may reopen old debates. That is not the purpose of this project.

History does not disappear simply because it is uncomfortable.

This project is being published in a year of significance for the club — the 60th anniversary of its entry into elite competition. It also coincides with the inclusion of Roger Cowan’s in the list of Panthers’ Legends.

These milestones do not define the purpose of this website. However, they provide an appropriate moment to revisit and preserve this period of the club’s history.

Why Preserve This Record

Sporting organisations, like all institutions, are shaped by ambition, personality, disagreement. resilience and change. Panthers’ evolution was no exception.

The period covered here includes:

  • The transformation of the club from a modest regional entity into a major licensed and sporting organisation.
  • Structural reform in governance and management.
  • Board conflict and the events surrounding the Inquiry.
  • Significant regulatory and political shifts affecting the club industry in New South Wales.

These developments unfolded simultaneously. They influenced one another. They shaped the institution that exists today.

History deserves more than a summary.

Structure and Intent

The manuscript has been divided into readable segments and serialised to allow closer engagement and to provide narrative clarity.

Where necessary, material that diverted from the central narrative flow has been relocated to Beyond the Book. These passages remain true to the original manuscript and are presented as supplementary material. No material has been removed from the original manuscript, but some material has been relocated to Beyond the Book.

The website operates under a deliberate structural discipline:

  • The original manuscript is preserved without retrospective commentary.
  • Archival and contextual material is clearly separated.
  • Personal reflection is identified as such.

This separation is intentional. It protects the integrity of the original narrative while allowing space for context and reflection without distortion.

In projects that revisit contested history, both structure and restraint are important.

Restraint allows complexity.
Complexity allows fairness.

Fairness matters when history intersects with living memory.

A Personal Dimension

The events documented were not simply institutional matters. They affected individuals and families — including my own.

It would be neither accurate nor honest to suggest otherwise.

At the same time, this project is not intended as a platform for grievance. It is not an attempt to settle old scores. It is not a campaign.

Jennie’s manuscript is presented substantially as it was written. It reflects the tone and perspective of its time. Where I add context or reflection, that material is clearly identified and separated.

My intention is not to provide the final word — but to contribute responsibly to the historical record.

Readers can draw their own conclusions.